skip intro
 
february 10 2010

Brad Pitt and Iranian Missiles

written by: Christian Oth

Ever since photographers were forced to move from the darkroom to the computer a whole new plethora of image manipulation has become commonplace. Sure, there is a whole new skill set that has evolved over the past couple of decades and there is a lot of extremely well done retouching done. As a society we have to realize that we are now more than ever being visually subjected to certain ideals that don't exist in the real world.

Brad Pitt

The camera is a machine without feeling or opinion and we believe it is a tool to portray the truth. Society as a whole has learned that this is no longer the case. Practically every image you see has been altered in some form. We need to ask ourselves where to draw the line in digital retouching. *My philosophy? Light retouching, yes. In a news context, no* When you change the original intent of the photo, retouching has gone too far. Altering images in photojournalism is an example of where the magic of Photoshop crosses an ethical line and heats up the retouching debate. Photojournalism has long been regarded as being truthful. The images we see in the papers, television, and online that are considered journalistic we tend not to question their integrity. These days we are seeing more and more cases where these newsworthy images are being doctored. This in turn changes how the public trusts this profession and makes the professionals question the business they got into. Below are images that came out in the Daily Mail UK about how Iran had altered this photo to conceal that a missile had failed during a test. You can see in the second image they added the failed missile, according to the Daily Mail it was to make sure not to show weakness.

To read the full article click [here](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1033966/Pictured-How-Iran-doctored-photographs-hide-missile-failed-work.html) We all know by now there is tons and tons of retouching happening in magazines especially in the fashion world, I will write a whole other post on this and what is happening in France with their effort to change this. Today I want to talk about Brad Pitt’s cover of W magazine where the amazingly talented Chuck Close shot several close ups photos for the feature. NO retouching was done, on the insistence of Brad Pitt. Now he is a handsome man, and I have to say this would be easier for men than women. But I do have to point out that it was a rare and brave move for an actor in Hollywood.

Comments

Patty Piazza almost 2 years ago

THANK YOU, BRAD! It's a wonder young people, especially girls, have the courage to step outside of the house wearing the "ugly, imperfect" faces and bodies that are naturally theirs. Yes, we all know that retouching is done, but, nevertheless the images that burn into our minds are the flawless ones. How can we even imagine what celebrities look like when they have been practically cartooned into something surreal before they are presented to us.

Yes, I love make-up, fashion and all the girly-girl stuff. But give us something we can aspire to, please.

Brad, you look handsome. You look real. Thank you for letting us see you!

martha andrews almost 2 years ago

All I have to say is AMEN! Not only have we lost truth in images in journalism, I echo the comment above. As a mother of both daughters and sons, I worry that our children won't know what a real body/face looks like. How sad that this generation will not know the meaning of growing old gracefully, or how it is to love the spouse of your youth. I consider each line and wrinkle a map of the life I've lived. Love that Brad Pitt is willing to be real.

Follow

RSS

Archive

February 2012 (1)
January 2012 (4)
December 2011 (10)
November 2011 (5)
October 2011 (5)
September 2011 (2)
August 2011 (11)
July 2011 (6)
June 2011 (6)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (5)
March 2011 (8)
February 2011 (8)
January 2011 (14)
December 2010 (9)
November 2010 (12)
October 2010 (12)
September 2010 (15)
August 2010 (10)
July 2010 (3)
June 2010 (6)
May 2010 (3)
April 2010 (4)
March 2010 (8)
February 2010 (7)
January 2010 (6)